the vulnerability of Western democracy was enlarged again. That year

is a difficult Cheap North Carolina Basketball Jerseys road to democracy

Thailand is one of the earliest to Cheap Oklahoma Sooners Basketball Jerseys absorb the concept of democracy in Southeast Asian countries. In the ruling dynasty Bangkok Rama IV and Cheap Michael Jordan NCAA Jerseys Rama V (1851-1910) period, Thailand's rulers have begun to learn from western countries, the introduction of Western democratic ideas. In 1932, a coup ended the feudal system in Thailand, opened a constitutional monarchy under a constitutional democracy, open the constitutional democratic era.

but the forms Cheap Marquette Golden Eagles Jerseys of Cheap California Golden Bears Jerseys democracy and the traditional collision lasted more than half a century. Until the 80's of the last century, Thailand really the end of military rule, the Westminster system of parliamentary system in Thailand play a real function. But a military coup in 1990 and the following year "May Massacre" once again shows the Thailand traditional military political counterattack, western democracy is still in the The climate does not suit one. stage in Thailand.

in the late 90's western democracy in Thailand actively evolution as the golden age of normal. At this stage, Thailand's political peace, rapid economic development, social stability. Until 1997, Soros in Thailand to engage in the and triggered the Asian financial turmoil, the vulnerability of Western democracy was enlarged again. That year, Thailand's political turmoil, partisan banbangege, plutocracy and group politics deduce various version of democracy, said all the words, Each sticks to his own view. The import of democracy and native political and difficult integration, resulting in the National Development Party and a number of old parties withdraw from the political arena, the various political forces such as stragglers and disbanded soldiers generally cruising in politics and.

Thaksin Shinawatra came to power in 2001, abandoned the political elite, give up once and big business, big group cooperation in the political tradition, go to the grass-roots route. Because he believed himself the richest in the world, he no longer by wooing the chaebol to make political sentiment, but suppress the plutocratic elite to pay for their own grassroots policy. He believed that, although a chaebol wealth can be worth a constituency, but in the voting, but one person one vote, for politicians, "grass" means to consolidate their own back garden "".

has so far, the elite and the grassroots opposition group, two generation, the two camps competition started.

Hard as the Democratic

anti Thaksin groups is very clear, including city middle class, business interests and the old Democratic Party and other political political group anti Thaksin appeal. Since 2005, he won the election, absolute superiority to become the first history of Thailand re elected prime minister, anti Thaksin groups found, he believed in a monopoly on Thailand politics, his fortune to members of other parties, make some political talents to join our party political group; he depends on the policy of vote buying, and make other parties even comprehensive joint cannot share; he even by legislation to pave the way for their own interests, make him believe group appeared to do what do what situation.

anti Thaksin groups first thought is to use the essence of Western democracy -- election tool. The election was >