2014年4月24日星期四

Expert public pension insurance claim is Utopia is not possible

Tang Jun

recently, about the endowment insurance, there are two conflicting or a little give tit for tat news reports. A pension insurance scheme has finished, or within cheap football ncaa jerseys the year; another said, pension insurance scheme is still confidential stage, "about the early".

the first message from an unnamed "close to the cheap jerseys us Ministry of human resources and social security officials". His argument is: "merger plan has been completed, including the major ministries such as the Ministry of finance, the national development and Reform Commission also agreed; may further modify, argument, then submitted to the state council. If no accident, insurance scheme years can be issued."

Origin of

second messages on social security center interview professor Zheng cheap club soccer jerseys Gongcheng of Renmin University of China. The reporter asked: "now this plan basically has formed?" Zheng Gongcheng replied: "no, this is just in the discussion." Reporter asked: "at the end of this reform is not released,?" Zheng Gongcheng replied: "no, on."

Detailed description and analysis of the source and the reported

contrast the two sources of complexity, "probably" relates to the problem, Zheng Gongcheng said cheapjerseys.us may be more reliable for some.

dual system reform remain stagnant,

and the system resistance is not what the relationship between

used to involve "remain stagnant double track system" reform of social public opinion, most of the blame on the civil servants and institutions of staff dissatisfaction and resistance. For example, the report says, "the industry" will cause the institution staff pension insurance system reform "pilot no fruit", attributed to the institutions that retirement benefits and reduce the resistance. In fact, this is not the whole truth, imagine, if the reform scheme can guarantee civil servants and institutions now pay and future pension benefits are not affected, why should they dissatisfaction and even resist?

of course, as the voice of a very high "merger", the public imagination in fact mostly: one is to civil servants and institutions of staff to take out money from now pay to pay, two enterprises and institutions retirees pension benefits are equal. However, seek truth from facts and said, "this idea may not suit the cheap national team soccer jerseys actual". To put it bluntly, this assumption and the government said "merger" is not the same thing: one, is not difficult to civil servants and institutions of staff salary payment, first line; second, if the basic endowment insurance and occupation pension together, the final results will not be equal.

some "merger" proposal does not have operable

the report, disclosure of the details of technical and "merger" related, but these seemingly "details" to solve problems in fact is not so simple.

for example, reported, "occupation pension" as a "merger" of the "mystery", the corresponding solutions given by experts is: "civil servants, all institutions of the occupation pension funds to >

相关的主题文章:

没有评论:

发表评论